<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: stop.think: Share the Road</title>
	<atom:link href="http://treadly.net/2006/11/08/stopthink-share-the-road/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://treadly.net/2006/11/08/stopthink-share-the-road/</link>
	<description>Work is just something I do between bike rides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treadly and Me</title>
		<link>http://treadly.net/2006/11/08/stopthink-share-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Treadly and Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://treadly.thingoid.com/?p=244#comment-418</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;All I recall is that we&#039;ve had one of them fancy &quot;Share the Road&quot; campaigns. Can&#039;t remember a thing about it, although &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/VRNE/vrne5nav.nsf/v/5DE66B62754A00F5CA2571BD0005ECF3/$file/STRgeneralJune04.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the logo&lt;/a&gt; looks vaguely familiar. Sad, isn&#039;t it?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for local council engineers&#8212;is it always a &lt;em&gt;size&lt;/em&gt; thing with those guys? If it ain&#039;t a big, hefty &lt;strong&gt;engineered&lt;/strong&gt; solution, it&#039;s not even worth grunting at. Or so it would seem.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I recall is that we&#8217;ve had one of them fancy &#8220;Share the Road&#8221; campaigns. Can&#8217;t remember a thing about it, although <a href="http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/VRNE/vrne5nav.nsf/v/5DE66B62754A00F5CA2571BD0005ECF3/$file/STRgeneralJune04.pdf" rel="nofollow">the logo</a> looks vaguely familiar. Sad, isn&#8217;t it?</p>

<p>As for local council engineers&mdash;is it always a <em>size</em> thing with those guys? If it ain&#8217;t a big, hefty <strong>engineered</strong> solution, it&#8217;s not even worth grunting at. Or so it would seem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfsmtb</title>
		<link>http://treadly.net/2006/11/08/stopthink-share-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>cfsmtb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://treadly.thingoid.com/?p=244#comment-417</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Recall the &quot;Share the Road&quot; campaign from VicRoads circa 2004? Damn near sank without a trace, although most of the stuff is still online. Unfortunately the nifty wallet-sized &quot;Cyclists &amp; Drivers FAQ&quot; isn&#039;t there anymore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Laws, rules and due process aside for a mo, how can more road user compliance actually occur when the bog standard stuff like common courtesy is waning? Dare mention hippy stuff such as community development around traffic engineers &amp; they&#039;re liable to break out in a nasty prickly rash...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recall the &#8220;Share the Road&#8221; campaign from VicRoads circa 2004? Damn near sank without a trace, although most of the stuff is still online. Unfortunately the nifty wallet-sized &#8220;Cyclists &amp; Drivers FAQ&#8221; isn&#8217;t there anymore.</p>

<p>Laws, rules and due process aside for a mo, how can more road user compliance actually occur when the bog standard stuff like common courtesy is waning? Dare mention hippy stuff such as community development around traffic engineers &amp; they&#8217;re liable to break out in a nasty prickly rash&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treadly and Me</title>
		<link>http://treadly.net/2006/11/08/stopthink-share-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Treadly and Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://treadly.thingoid.com/?p=244#comment-416</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Chris really makes a good point and it&#039;s one that I didn&#039;t mention: what is the bloody point of running a campaign like this for two measly weeks? For instance, it appears that the Stuart O&#039;Grady ad ran from 17 to 31 July 2005.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You know which brands belong to &quot;Oh what a feeling!&quot; and &quot;Zoom-zoom&quot;, don&#039;t you? The brand recognition is so strong that it&#039;s actually difficult to keep the products &lt;em&gt;out&lt;/em&gt; of your head when you hear these catch-cries.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Oh what a feeling!&quot; has been on high-rotation for a couple of &lt;strong&gt;deacades&lt;/strong&gt; now (I kid you not) and Mazda&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto_News/Daily_Auto_News/Daily_Edition_Aug_17_2004.S173.A7427.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Zoom-Zoom&quot; theme dates back to about 1998&lt;/a&gt;. And it seems like only yesterday, doesn&#039;t it? Long-lasting repetition of the same message, in different variations, over and over again&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In contrast, the chances are dismally small of making a 30 second community service announcement stick in people&#039;s minds when it&#039;s only run for two weeks. If driver education is to be conducted in this way, then perhaps &lt;a href=&quot;2006/11/06/driver-training-is-pointless/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dr Clapton&lt;/a&gt; is right after all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris really makes a good point and it&#8217;s one that I didn&#8217;t mention: what is the bloody point of running a campaign like this for two measly weeks? For instance, it appears that the Stuart O&#8217;Grady ad ran from 17 to 31 July 2005.</p>

<p>You know which brands belong to &#8220;Oh what a feeling!&#8221; and &#8220;Zoom-zoom&#8221;, don&#8217;t you? The brand recognition is so strong that it&#8217;s actually difficult to keep the products <em>out</em> of your head when you hear these catch-cries.</p>

<p>&#8220;Oh what a feeling!&#8221; has been on high-rotation for a couple of <strong>deacades</strong> now (I kid you not) and Mazda&#8217;s <a href="http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto_News/Daily_Auto_News/Daily_Edition_Aug_17_2004.S173.A7427.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Zoom-Zoom&#8221; theme dates back to about 1998</a>. And it seems like only yesterday, doesn&#8217;t it? Long-lasting repetition of the same message, in different variations, over and over again&hellip;</p>

<p>In contrast, the chances are dismally small of making a 30 second community service announcement stick in people&#8217;s minds when it&#8217;s only run for two weeks. If driver education is to be conducted in this way, then perhaps <a href="2006/11/06/driver-training-is-pointless/" rel="nofollow">Dr Clapton</a> is right after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris L</title>
		<link>http://treadly.net/2006/11/08/stopthink-share-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 03:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://treadly.thingoid.com/?p=244#comment-415</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks remarkably similar to the one they aired here in Queensland back in 2000.  I can&#039;t say it made a lot of difference at the time, a 30-second slot on the telly isn&#039;t really all that effective unless a LOT of money is spent on repeats.  Given the amount of other advertising that surrounds it, I think most viewers just blocked it out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personally, I think a few fines and/or prison sentences for people who break the law would be far more effective.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks remarkably similar to the one they aired here in Queensland back in 2000.  I can&#8217;t say it made a lot of difference at the time, a 30-second slot on the telly isn&#8217;t really all that effective unless a LOT of money is spent on repeats.  Given the amount of other advertising that surrounds it, I think most viewers just blocked it out.</p>

<p>Personally, I think a few fines and/or prison sentences for people who break the law would be far more effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treadly and Me</title>
		<link>http://treadly.net/2006/11/08/stopthink-share-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Treadly and Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://treadly.thingoid.com/?p=244#comment-414</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think the problem lies with the road rules themselves (see my comment on this topic in &lt;a href=&quot;/2006/11/03/white-line-fever/#comment-2712&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;another entry&lt;/a&gt;) and as Crowlie says planning initiatives that show no initiative are also a problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But most importantly, &quot;share the road&quot; is a message that doesn&#039;t seem to become dated. Let&#039;s hope someday&#8212;soon&#8212;that we won&#039;t need it anymore.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the problem lies with the road rules themselves (see my comment on this topic in <a href="/2006/11/03/white-line-fever/#comment-2712" rel="nofollow">another entry</a>) and as Crowlie says planning initiatives that show no initiative are also a problem.</p>

<p>But most importantly, &#8220;share the road&#8221; is a message that doesn&#8217;t seem to become dated. Let&#8217;s hope someday&mdash;soon&mdash;that we won&#8217;t need it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

